news
How Geelong's Property Listings Ended Up Flooded With the Wrong Photos, and What Led Us Here
A chain of rapid-fire database migrations, agency mergers and pandemic-era shortcuts left thousands of Geelong home listings carrying mismatched or duplicated images, and the cleanup is still underway.
How we reported this

Search for a three-bedroom house in Belmont on any of the major real estate portals this week and there is a reasonable chance the first photograph you see belongs to a different property entirely. The problem, duplicate or misplaced listing images attached to residential properties across the Geelong region, has been quietly worsening since at least 2022, and the agencies, councils and data aggregators responsible are only now mounting a coordinated response.
The issue matters right now because Geelong's property market is under unusual scrutiny. Federal investment flowing through the Geelong City Deal, announced in 2019 and extended through to 2026, has accelerated new residential construction in corridors stretching from Armstrong Creek in the south to Lara in the north. More listings means more images uploaded faster, and more opportunity for the underlying data infrastructure to buckle.
A Problem Years in the Making
The roots of the duplicate-image problem stretch back to a specific window: late 2020 through mid-2021, when a wave of agency consolidations swept through the Barwon region. When smaller independents were absorbed into national franchise networks, several offices along Pakington Street in Newtown and Malop Street in the CBD changed hands during that period, their listing databases were migrated at speed. Image file identifiers, which link a photograph to its correct property record, were frequently remapped incorrectly during those transfers.
Deakin University's School of Information Technology, based at the Waurn Ponds campus on Pigdons Road, has been tracking data-integrity failures in Australian real estate platforms as part of broader research into digital infrastructure. Without citing specific unpublished findings, the work broadly aligns with what practitioners in the industry have described anecdotally: rushed database migrations produce orphaned image records that then get re-associated with whatever active listing is closest in the system queue.
A second aggravating factor was the shift to virtual inspections during pandemic lockdowns. Agencies began bulk-uploading image sets, sometimes dozens of photos per listing, at a pace that outstripped the quality-control capacity of platforms optimised for slower, in-person sales cycles. The Geelong office of Consumer Affairs Victoria received a measurable uptick in complaints related to misleading property photographs during the first half of 2022, though the precise number has not been made public.
Where the Cleanup Stands Today
The Real Estate Institute of Victoria flagged the issue in its 2024 annual technology review, and at least two major listing aggregators have since introduced automated duplicate-detection tools. In practice, those tools flag potential mismatches but require a human reviewer to confirm the correction, creating a backlog that the industry has not yet cleared.
Locally, the problem is most visible in high-turnover suburbs. Armstrong Creek, where new estates like Warralily have produced hundreds of near-identical townhouse listings since 2021, has a particularly high incidence of swapped facade photographs. Buyers looking at a display-home image when they think they are looking at a resale property may not discover the discrepancy until they book an inspection.
For buyers and sellers in the Geelong region, the practical advice from property law firms operating along Ryrie Street is consistent: always request a full image audit as part of vendor disclosure, compare listing photographs against Google Street View where possible, and note the upload date on each image set. Listings where the photograph metadata predates the advertised construction date of the property are a red flag worth raising with the listing agent directly.
The state government's proposed reforms to the Estate Agents Act, flagged for public consultation later in 2026, are expected to include provisions around image accuracy and digital listing standards. Whether those reforms arrive before the next peak selling season, traditionally September through November, will determine how much of the current mess gets carried into another year.